Home Opinions ๐๐ž๐ฐ ๐˜๐จ๐ซ๐ค ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž๐ซ๐ฒ ๐“๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ฅโ€ฆ ๐ƒ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ž๐›๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐“๐จ ๐‹๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐’๐ญ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ 

๐๐ž๐ฐ ๐˜๐จ๐ซ๐ค ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž๐ซ๐ฒ ๐“๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ฅโ€ฆ ๐ƒ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ž๐›๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐“๐จ ๐‹๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐’๐ญ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ 

4 min read
0
3,946
๐๐ฒ ๐‰๐š๐ง๐ž ๐. ๐Œ๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ฒ.
In his objection at yesterdayโ€™s hearing in the alleged New York Chancery corruption trial, Lawyer Africanus Sorie Sesay said the video recording of the locus visit to New York has been used to ridicule the forth accused, Dr. Samura Mathew Wilson Kamara, the June 24 Presidential candidate of the main opposition All Peopleโ€™s Congress (APC).
At the start of the case, Counsel Africanus Sorie Sesay said there was no record of live streaming and doing so at this stage will prejudice the right of the accused. โ€œThis is not an ordinary case, there must be equality of treatment,โ€ Lawyer Africanus Sorie Sesay stated. Counsel Sesay cited Section 23 of Act No.6, 1991 constitution of Sierra Leone in support of his objection.
The video streaming in the trial, Counsel went on, touches and concerns the forth accusedโ€™s chances in the ballot box.
The trial Judge, Justice Adrian Fisher overruled counselโ€™s objection and said there is nothing inconsistent and does not contravene Section 23 of the 1991 Constitution.
According to Justice Adrian Fisher, public hearings are procedural, and the issue of live streaming is determined by the Judiciary to avoid false rumors from the public; it also creates room for transparency and free from lies.
โ€œI will not allow this case to be politicized, there was no live streaming at the start of the matter because the forth accused was an ordinary person, but because his status has changed and he is no longer an ordinary man it would be good for live streaming.
The two reports from the locus visit including a written report, video and photographs done by the Judiciary Director of Communications Mr. Elkass Sannah were produced and tendered.
Lawyer Africanus Sorie Sesay on behalf of the 2nd and 4th accused objected to the tendering of the reports but was again overruled by Justice Adrian fisher on the grounds that he has no legs to stand on.
The second prosecution witness Paul Opnada Bockarie, attached to the Ministry of Works was recalled by defense counsel Mohamed Pa. Momoh Fofana, and was cross examined on behalf of the first accused Mr. Saidu Nallo with regards to the locus visit to New York City.
Responding to questions, the witness said he went to see the Chancery Building in New York as a professional head and not as an expert.
The matter continues today, 6th April 2023.
Load More Related Articles
Load More By Amadu Daramy
Load More In Opinions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

20 + 20 =


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Check Also

๐•๐ ๐‰๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ž๐ก ๐‰๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ก ๐Œ๐ž๐ž๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ƒ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ž๐ ๐’๐ข๐ž๐ซ๐ซ๐š ๐‹๐ž๐จ๐ง๐ž๐š๐ง๐ฌ ๐€๐ญ ๐๐š๐ฆ๐ž๐ฅ๐š๐ฉ

The Honorable Vice President Dr Mohamed Juldeh Jalloh has just engaged a cross section of …